Criminal Justice Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Criminal Justice Test with our study materials. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question comes with hints and explanations. Ace your exam confidently!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

In which case did the Supreme Court expand protections against compelled self-incrimination for custodial interrogations?

Arizona c. Fulminante
Brown v. Mississippi
Miranda v. Arizona
Escobedo v. Illinois

The correct answer is: Miranda v. Arizona

The correct choice is demonstrated by the Supreme Court's decision in the case that established essential rights for individuals subjected to police interrogations. In this landmark ruling, the Court articulated the Miranda rights, which require law enforcement officials to inform individuals of their right to remain silent and to seek legal counsel while in custody. This ruling aims to protect individuals from coercive interrogation tactics that can lead to self-incrimination. The decision underscored the understanding that custodial situations create a heightened risk of coercion, necessitating clear safeguards to ensure individuals are aware of their rights. The ruling emphasizes that without these protections, any statements made during custodial interrogation could be deemed involuntary, compromising the integrity of the judicial process. This pivotal case has had a lasting impact on law enforcement practices and the rights of individuals within the legal system, ensuring that defendants can comfortably assert their right to remain silent and receive legal guidance during police questioning.